Disappointing comment, Tom. Jack
--- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think this falls clearly into the category "if one doesn't know > what they > are talking about, one should keep one's mouth shut". > > Spreading gossip, innuendo, and hearsay does not help the cause of > truth or > justice. > > Tom C. > > > > > >From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: [email protected] > >To: [email protected] > >Subject: Re: Vigilant or Bloody Minded > >Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 14:25:32 -0800 (PST) > > > >Why do you conclude that the shop owner will fire the employee prior > to > >the court's decision? Would you? I wouldn't, nor would I bear any > >responsibility if he did. Advising the owner is the "responsible" > thing > >to do. > > > >Jack > > > > > >--- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > The shop owner isn't in jeopardy. All he did was hire someone, > > > apparently after any alleged misdeeds took place. Until proven > > > guilty, > > > the accused should be allowed to earn a living. The world is > plagued > > > with busybodies who can't keep their nose out of other people's > > > business. > > > Paul > > > On Jan 8, 2006, at 4:17 PM, Jack Davis wrote: > > > > > > > In this case, Paul, the shop owner is in jeopardy and deserves > to > > > be > > > > alerted. > > > > > > > > Jack > > > > > > > > --- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > >> I've found that unless someone has been placed in jeopardy, > it's > > > best > > > >> > > > >> to mind one's own business. As others have said, "innocent > until > > > >> proven > > > >> guilt." > > > >> Paul > > > >> On Jan 8, 2006, at 10:28 AM, Jack Davis wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> Kevin, > > > >>> Understand your dilemma, but even though you don't know yet > "who > > > is > > > >>> working for him", due to this photo related situation, I'd > let > > > the > > > >>> owner know before too many others make the connection. > > > >>> Are you certain this is the same person and that the owner > won't > > > >> fain > > > >>> shock and surprise? > > > >>> > > > >>> Jack > > > >>> > > > >>> --- Kevin Waterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>>> I recently walked into a large Sydney camera store and > ventured > > > to > > > >>>> the > > > >>>> "pro section" to purchase some Fuji Provia. I was astounded > that > > > >> the > > > >>>> person serving me was an ex-photog who is currently in the > midst > > > >> of > > > >>>> a child porn investigation. He worked with his uncle who has > > > been > > > >>>> charged > > > >>>> and a trial is due. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> My question is, should I make the store owner aware of who > is > > > >> working > > > >>>> for him? > > > >>>> Am I being vigilant or is it sheer bloody mindedness on my > part? > > > >>>> Is this really none of my business? > > > >>>> I must admit this sort of thing boils my blood quickly. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Kind regards > > > >>>> Kevin > > > >>>> > > > >>>> -- > > > >>>> "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have > for > > > >> lunch. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> __________________________________________ > > > >>> Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about. > > > >>> Just $16.99/mo. or less. > > > >>> dsl.yahoo.com > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________ > > > > Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about. > > > > Just $16.99/mo. or less. > > > > dsl.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >__________________________________________ > >Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about. > >Just $16.99/mo. or less. > >dsl.yahoo.com > > > > > __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com
