Here, here!!

Jack



--- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> The man's privacy and right to a fair hearing are the most important 
> considerations here. I doubt that anyone would stop patronizing a
> store 
> because an employee may or may not be guilty of some vague charge. In
> 
> any case, this is getting quite absurd. I'm sure Kevin has heard
> enough 
> to get a feeling for how others feel about this.
> Paul
> On Jan 8, 2006, at 7:08 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> 
> > Exactly to your point that rumors will be rampant, thus the
> business
> > will likely suffer.
> >
> > Jack
> >
> > --- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Exactly?? If you agree that the man is entitled to privacy and a
> fair
> >>
> >> hearing, then why do you want to communicate the rumor to the
> store
> >> owner? That will only help ensure that he loses both.
> >> Paul
> >> On Jan 8, 2006, at 6:40 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> >>
> >>> Exactly!
> >>>
> >>> Jack
> >>>
> >>> --- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Rumors have legs when busybodies repeat them. The man is
> entitled
> >> to
> >>>> both privacy and a fair hearing.
> >>>> Paul
> >>>> On Jan 8, 2006, at 5:52 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I went back to Kevin's original post and found nothing about an
> >>>>> "uncle". I read it as the employee himself is in the midst of
> an
> >>>>> investigation. If the uncle thing were true, then I agree with
> >> you.
> >>>> If
> >>>>> not, as I wrote, the shops business could suffer directly as
> >> rumors
> >>>>> have legs.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Jack
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --- William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>>>> From: "Jack Davis"
> >>>>>> Subject: Re: Vigilant or Bloody Minded
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Try to carefully read and attempt to understand my messages.
> >>>>>>> Appears there is some "confusion".
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Upon re reading what I replied to, I find you are saying that
> >> the
> >>>>>> store
> >>>>>> owner is in jeopardy because the uncle of one of his emplyees
> >> has
> >>>>>> been
> >>>>>> charged with a crime.
> >>>>>> I am just wondering how the store owner is in jeopardy?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> William Robb
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>                 
> >>>>> __________________________________________
> >>>>> Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about.
> >>>>> Just $16.99/mo. or less.
> >>>>> dsl.yahoo.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>           
> >>> __________________________________________
> >>> Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about.
> >>> Just $16.99/mo. or less.
> >>> dsl.yahoo.com
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >             
> > __________________________________________
> > Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about.
> > Just $16.99/mo. or less.
> > dsl.yahoo.com
> >
> 
> 
> 



                
__________________________________________ 
Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. 
Just $16.99/mo. or less. 
dsl.yahoo.com 

Reply via email to