My final words on the subject: You have no clue as to the actual spread of support.
Jack --- John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You're the one with the personal involvement, trying to > justify un-warranted intervention and rumour-mongering. > > As should be apparent to you by now, you're not getting > a lot of support for that position. > > If that means somehow you don't 'win', then so be it. > > > On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 04:23:20PM -0800, Jack Davis wrote: > > No, your not. It's gotten bitter and has taken on a "win", no > matter > > how personal one has to be. > > I wonder if some of this salivating won't short out some keyboards. > > > > Jack > > > > --- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Am I the only one confused by the way this thread is going now? > > > > > > Tom C. > > > > > > > > > >From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >Reply-To: [email protected] > > > >To: [email protected] > > > >Subject: Re: Vigilant or Bloody Minded > > > >Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 15:40:09 -0800 (PST) > > > > > > > >Exactly! > > > > > > > >Jack > > > > > > > >--- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Rumors have legs when busybodies repeat them. The man is > entitled > > > to > > > > > both privacy and a fair hearing. > > > > > Paul > > > > > On Jan 8, 2006, at 5:52 PM, Jack Davis wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I went back to Kevin's original post and found nothing > about an > > > > > > "uncle". I read it as the employee himself is in the midst > of > > > an > > > > > > investigation. If the uncle thing were true, then I agree > with > > > you. > > > > > If > > > > > > not, as I wrote, the shops business could suffer directly > as > > > rumors > > > > > > have legs. > > > > > > > > > > > > Jack > > > > > > > > > > > > --- William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > >> From: "Jack Davis" > > > > > >> Subject: Re: Vigilant or Bloody Minded > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >>> Try to carefully read and attempt to understand my > messages. > > > > > >>> Appears there is some "confusion". > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Upon re reading what I replied to, I find you are saying > that > > > the > > > > > >> store > > > > > >> owner is in jeopardy because the uncle of one of his > emplyees > > > has > > > > > >> been > > > > > >> charged with a crime. > > > > > >> I am just wondering how the store owner is in jeopardy? > > > > > >> > > > > > >> William Robb > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________ > > > > > > Yahoo! DSL ? Something to write home about. > > > > > > Just $16.99/mo. or less. > > > > > > dsl.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >__________________________________________ > > > >Yahoo! DSL ? Something to write home about. > > > >Just $16.99/mo. or less. > > > >dsl.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________ > > Yahoo! DSL ? Something to write home about. > > Just $16.99/mo. or less. > > dsl.yahoo.com > > __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com
