And the beat goes on.
Jack
--- William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jack Davis"
> Subject: Re: Vigilant or Bloody Minded
>
>
> >I went back to Kevin's original post and found nothing about an
> > "uncle". I read it as the employee himself is in the midst of an
> > investigation. If the uncle thing were true, then I agree with you.
> If
> > not, as I wrote, the shops business could suffer directly as rumors
> > have legs.
> >
>
> Well, Jack, here is the pertinent part of the original post,
> available on
> the archives.
>
> " I recently walked into a large Sydney camera store and ventured to
> the
> "pro section" to purchase some Fuji Provia. I was astounded that the
> person serving me was an ex-photog who is currently in the midst of
> a child porn investigation. He worked with his uncle who has been
> charged
> and a trial is due."
>
> The syntax of the last sentence tells me that the fellow has not been
>
> charged, but worked with someone (his uncle) who has been.
>
> So, lets put out a scenario.
>
> There's this guy named Jack Davis. Nice enough chap, but the guy who
> works
> at the next desk has had his computer impounded by the police, and he
> has
> been charged with harbouring kiddie porn. During the course of the
> investigation, they also had a look at Jack's computer.
> Anyway, Jack decided to go work at another office, since the morale
> at this
> one went to hell, and someone walked in and saw Jack sitting there at
> a
> desk, and was aghast, since he had been in the midst of a kiddie porn
>
> invetigation recently.
>
> So, do we tell this to the new employer, knowing that this makes Jack
> look
> bad by association and may cost him his job?
>
> Your call.
> I'd keep my mouth shut and let the people who are supposed to handle
> this
> sort of thing handle it.
>
> William Robb
>
>
>
__________________________________________
Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about.
Just $16.99/mo. or less.
dsl.yahoo.com
