Bob Shell wrote:



You'll love it.

My only complaint is that Adobe is too damned conservative in their public product names. "Lightroom" is an OK name, but the code name prior to release was "Shadowland", a MUCH cooler name! I was hoping they'd keep that name.

It's partially an answer to Apple's Aperture, and I love it that Adobe is giving it away for free while Apple is trying to charge an absurdly high price for Aperture. And yes, it runs on older Macs. Apple would give me a NFR copy of Aperture, but it won't run on my two year old G4 iMac.

Bob

From what I see, it's more than an answer to Aperture, since Adobe didn't make some of the major mistakes Apple did (Building RAW support in at the OS level is nifty, but not very flexible, and Apple made some stupid mistakes, like supporting the Rebel XT but not the 350D, despite their RAW's being identical apart from 1 tag. Or the lack of real DNG support, or the stupid monolithic database structure a la iPhoto[ ironically, that's one of the two reasons I don't even contemplate using iPhoto).

But yeah, the name kinda sucks, the interface isn't as pretty, and it's not feature complete. But it does run on my 1 year old eMac (And hopefully soon on my much faster PC with the 21" monitor).

-Adam

Reply via email to