They should be sued for all they're worth collectively and individually.
And then kicked out and banned from their profession. Those kind of people
are so blinded by their zeal, that they don't begin to consider the harm
they cause by taking unfounded action.
I could find you scores of similar news stories in the US.
Tom C.
From: "John Forbes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Vigilant or Bloody Minded
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 19:15:56 -0000
Here is an example of people rushing wrongly to judgement. A local
council removed children from their families because some idiot believed
rumours about satanism. The consequences were devastating.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/manchester/4602268.stm
There are always far too many people ready to believe the worst, however
nonsensical.
John
PS: Jack - I thought you were being serious. Apologies. Moral: don't
forget the smiley. Not all list members were lucky enough to attend a US
High School. :-)
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:13:38 -0000, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Okay, chase is over.
Jack
--- Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Jack Davis wrote:
> You're right, it was Kostas who used the "personal tone". My
apologies,
> Rob.
> Kostas?
No, no personal tone in the "gut feeling" statement, went for a joke
that did not quite work. The "metrics" part you have answered. The
"humorist" comment is John's.
Kostas
> Jack
>
> --- David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Ahh... Rob didn't say that. He said:
>>
>> "Yeah, Judge Judy airs here too"
>>
>> This is the problem with chopping emails up, people get miss
quoted.
>>
>> Dave
>>
>> On 1/11/06, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> As you say, you're missing some posts.
>>> The statement is a parroting of a formula comment picked up
>> (professed)
>>> in high school. It was offered with a curiosity about the
reaction.
>>> Rob, why the personal tone?
>>>
>>> Jack
>>>
>>> --- Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, John Forbes wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 03:23:03 -0000, Rob Studdert
>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10 Jan 2006 at 16:32, Jack Davis wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> US justice system is far from perfect, it's only the best one
>> in
>>>> the
>>>>>>> world.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah, Judge Judy airs here too. ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rob Studdert
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> He's quite the humourist, this Jack Davis. But he has a short,
>> and
>>>> rather
>>>>> selective, memory.
>>>>
>>>> I missed the original post. Jack, I am wondering about the
>> metrics
>>>> you
>>>> are using to deduce that it's the best in the world.
>>>>
>>>> If you tell me "gut feeling", I should remind you what it's full
>> of.
>>>>
>>>> Kostas
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________
>>> Do You Yahoo!?
>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
