Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>William Robb wrote:
>
>> but it's not too much 
>> difficulty to have a battery pack or winder on the camera.
>> I will be peeved if the "improved" DSLR weighs less than the istD, 
>> and/or doesn't accomodate a vertical release and battery pack.
>
>I think the battery pack/vertical release is an essential item and never 
>used the D without it.  I like being able to rotate to a vertical 
>orientation and use the vertical release (with associated wheelie 
>thingies). After years of not having it on my LX, MX, SuperProgram, etc. 
>I can't live without it now.  If the D's successor does not have 
>provision for battery grip/vertical release you'd never be able to call 
>it "improved" :-)

What I'm hoping is that they keep all the good things about the ist-D
and just improve it in other areas. I love having the battery grip and
vertical controls, but I also love being able to remove it when
traveling light. For my fall cycling trip in France I kept the ist-D,
sans battery grip, and a couple of primes in my Tamrac Velocity 7 bag
for a compact, lightweight kit. One day I put off recharging the
batteries one day more than I should have. No problem: Just stopped in
at a drug store/chemist's and picked up four Lithium AA and I was on my
way again in minutes :)
Needless to say, I hope they keep the AA power supply.
 
 
-- 
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com

Reply via email to