Mark Roberts wrote:
Sylwester Pietrzyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2006-01-14, at 18:52, DagT wrote:
The DA40mm does cover FF and the 16-45 too above a focal length
(does anybody know about the 50-200?) and thus the required
movements of the sensor is small.
AFAIR when I tried DA 40 with MZ-5N I saw heavy vignetting in the
viewfinder. Where's the truth then?
Darby Chang tested the DA 40 on a film camera and posted the results on
the web (I forget where). The results showed some fall-off in the
corners when wide open (about 1 stop, IIRC), but not worse than a lot of
standard lenses when wide open.
I'd just deleted the page after doing some housekeeping. But I've put it
back up.
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/DA40/index.html
D
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc
