Because 350D is better in any way (maybe sensor... dunno if 6->8 MP shows any difference really) than a simple ist-Dl?
Show it to me ;) 2006/1/17, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >From: Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >The majority of the digital market is and always will be Consumer > >Electronics, the camera market is by and large a side-show for even the > >low-end DSLR's. > > > > I can't argue with that. > > Based on the premise (true or not) then, that most digital camera purchasers > are not *seriously* into photography as a hobby or profession, and are > merely consumers with expendable income, does that bode well for our > favorite company producing serious equipment? By "serious" I mean, gear > that competes on a par with it's competitors at the same time as it's > competitors. I know there's the 645 digital, but that will never be a > mainstream product. > > Pentax is what, around 4-6 months behind the gun right now in coming out > with a body that competes on a par with the low-end Canon (I honestly > haven't paid enough attention to know what Nikon's doing)? You can bet > though, that most consumers with $1K to spend on a DSLR, will opt for an 8MP > model over a 6MP model. > > Anyway, I'm not trying to be anti-Pentax. I don't know what the future > holds. I'm just saying there's more than one way to view the developments. > > Tom C. > > > -- ---------------------- Thibouille ---------------------- *ist-D,Z1,SFXn,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ...
