Hi Sandra,
Sounds like it's more a relationship problem than a hardware problem:-).
Seriously, digital has been very good to me, and my results are generally
better than they were with film. But I haven't changed the way I approach the
task. I still shoot as though I don't have a frame to spare and work at least
as carefully as I did with film. Consequently, the changes that digital has
brought to my work are good ones. Specifically, the ability to see results and
make adjustment when possible and the opportunity to fine tune a RAW image for
printing. Life is good. I'm in love.
Paul
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: "Sandra Hermann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> While I have never made love to a hooker. I feel the same way. I danced a
> fine dance with my Pz-70. The enterance of digital into my camera
> collection allowed me room for error. Yes the *Ds is a marvolous camera,
> but it gives me room to try again and I often miss the special moment that I
> found with the Pz-70. I take more pictures I have cd's of pictures but none
> that I am willing to post on a web page. Nothing worth even looking at if
> they didn't have my baby girl in them. Granted I wasn't the best to begin
> with, but I have lost my first love and photography will never be the same
> again.
> :(
> san
>
> >
> >Digital is like trying to make love to a hooker ... ;-))
> >
> >Shel
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On 18/1/06, Derby Chang said:
> > >
> > >Yep. Me too.
> >
> > >Film is like making love. Take your time. Sometimes it works, sometimes
> > >not. No guarantees. But when it does, it sure does beat the instant
> >result.
> >
> >
>
>
