Neither do I normally.

In the middle of being asked a question he spontaneously & for no
apparent reason started jumping up & down on the furniture. This I
found weird :-)

Dave

On 1/23/06, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't watch Oprah.  In what ways was his behavior uncharacteristic?  Was
> it "weird?"
>
> Shel
>
>
>
> > [Original Message]
> > Wrom: WCUFPEGAUTFJ
>
> > Shel you obviously missed the Tom Cruse "interview" with Oprah. His
> > behaviour during it & in various other interviews around the same time
> > are uncharacteristic to say the least.
> >
> > I have seen him interviewed many times over the years. He has always
> > come across as charming and entertaining. But his behaviour & ill
> > informed ramblings of late I can only categorise as weird!
> >
> > But he's rich, so he can't really be weird or crazy, just eccentric :-)
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > On 1/23/06, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > In which this statement can be found:
> > >
> > > "Don't immediately assume that he is ruining himself," said Allan Mayer,
> > > managing director of Los Angeles-based Sitrick and Co., which regularly
> > > handles celebrities' PR crises. "He himself has said he doesn't care,
> and
> > > who are we to say he's made a mistake? . . . What's the point of being a
> > > hugely successful and powerful movie star if you can't talk about the
> > > things that matter to you? We may think it's silly and bizarre, but it's
> > > obviously important to him."
> > >
> > > I'm not a believer in Scientology, nor do follow or advocate any
> religion
> > > specifically, however, there are many people with numerous causes and
> > > beliefs who are extremely outspoken about them, who sometimes get their
> > > facts wrong, and who are also in the public eye.  Most of these people
> are
> > > not branded with the label "weird" just because of those beliefs.  Tom
> > > Cruise is more visible than many celebrities because of his huge box
> office
> > > draw and his world-wide fame.  He's the ability to make his views heard
> in
> > > ways others don't.
> > >
> > > The article portrays Cruise as something that he may not be - out of
> > > control.  He is a primary spokesman for Scientology, if not the primary
> and
> > > premier spokesman. It's his job to get people interested in the scheme,
> and
> > > he may even believe what he says.  But is that any more weird than the
> way
> > > other proselytize?  He carries his views to the extreme ... so do many
> > > others.
> > >
> > > Wikipedia is bullshit ....
> > >
> > > Shel
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > [Original Message]
> > > > Wrom: MVRESKPNKMB
> > >
> > > > Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >I just asked Marnie in what way she thought Tom Cruise is weird.
> > > > >
> > > > Well, I don't know for certain what provoked Marnie to say it, but I
> > > > agreed with her in large part because of the incident referred to
> here:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/24/AR2005062401
> > > 866_pf.html
> > > >
> > > > The Wikipedia (spelling?) entry on him is kind of, um, interesting as
> > > well.
> > > >
> > > > Incidentally, to clarify in advance -- I just found that Washington
> Post
> > > > item for the first time, but since it provides the story, I didn't
> > > > continue searching for my original source of information about the
> > > > episode. I didn't base my opinion on the WP article, which appears to
> be
> > > > an opinion piece, but on news reports of the same interview (and its
> > > > fallout.)
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
>

Reply via email to