Mon, 23 Jan 2006 15:02:33 -0800 Bob W wrote: > Hi, > > here's a photo of mine I just found while rummaging around in the > undergrowth. I don't think I've shown it before. It's part of a > long-neglected series which I work on intermittently showing people rather > crushed by the world. > > It needs straightening up a bit, and there's some burn-out in the whites, > but otherwise I quite like it. I'd be interested to hear other opinions. > > http://www.web-options.com/Image02.jpg >
Usually, when I have time to look at the images posted to PDML, I can crudely divide them in three categories: 1. great photo (I wish I did it/could do it); 2. image that doesn't touch me; 3. image that grabbed my attention for one or another reason, but either I don't like something in it, or I don't understand something in it, or I know what I would try differently, or something else of my "personal disturbance". This could be images that I (partially or fully) like or dislike. I seldom respond in case of #1. I am probably wrong about this, as "even a cat enjoys kind words", but usually I feel that it is too banal to say "great shot" when it is obvious. I obviously don't respond to #2. Case #3 is usually the one when I share my "imho". This is one of those cases. So, after this digression.. I feel a bit stupid (it seems like it is clear to all others.), but I would like to ask: what was this? I.e. is this an actual building or is it just a theatrical stage setup? (It is not a painted wall or an overlay of two images, is it? :-) ) It's just a rather strange construction.. Igor
