On 1/30/06, Daniel J. Matyola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We can argue forever about how restrictive the rules for the PUGshould be. > The bottom line is that, if no one pays any attention towhat is posted, very > few will bother posting anything -- Pentax onnon-Pentax.
I agree, Dan. Most of the people whining about PUG have never posted, and don't comment. Changing the "rules" won't change that. I used to post regularly (I don't think I missed in about 5 years), and commented regularly, too. The excitement on the first of each month on the list was palpable. That stopped at least a couple of years ago (I think the ebb in the excitement predated PAWs and PESOs). If everyone who's posted on this thread to bemoan the demise of PUG was a regular poster, we wouldn't be having this discussion. cheers, frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
