Hmmm. I'd say the whole thing was just sort of bungled from the PDML
side. The photographer always retains all rights unless otherwise
indicated. Anyone who has ever sold a photo or even displayed a photo
must know that. It's as obvious as the nose on your face.
Paul
On Feb 7, 2006, at 7:26 PM, Tom C wrote:
They may have been spelled out (not as precisiely as I would have
wished) but numerous other things were not. And yes I think the words
"Photographer retains all rights or something like that should have
been used".
The whole thing was just sort of bungled from the Pentax side...
Tom C.
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pentax Wants Your Digital Pix
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 18:15:54 -0600
----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom C"
Subject: Re: Pentax Wants Your Digital Pix
Point taken,
But why then is any size image copyrighted?
I just have to say this one more time... it's not that a nefarious
purpose was suspected... it's that having a little pride in my
images, I'd like to know exactly what their terms of use is,
especially given that I can expect zero compensation... and for the
last time I'll belabor it, if this was all spelled out up front in
an official manner, any worry, doubt, suspicion, would have been
avoided.
Tom, the terms of use were spelled out.
William Robb
