Same here, Rod. Difference being I bought the MZ-S, etc. while I could still find one. It has kept me juiced about shooting and completely happy with film. (Find, however, that I shoot just as much with the LX). It has been my plan to keep track of Pentax DSLR progress (?) and possibly make a move, utilizing my existing glass, when a truly tech. "high end" contender became available. This, of course, only after having sensed a positive reaction by the brotherhood, etc..
Jack --- Rob Studdert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8 Feb 2006 at 23:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Funny. I remember when the *istD came out. Everyone felt it came > out way too > > late. But those that bought it loved it. Or at least liked it very, > very much. > > And bing, bing, bing, people were buying it. And several commented > there > > wasn't much more they'd want in a camera (for the technology at the > time). > > And some of us bought it purely because it was the only damned thing > that > allowed us to shoot digital with our existing lenses, some of us have > even been > been waiting for an improved camera since that time. I only intended > mine to be > an interim tool as it wasn't what I was looking for spec wise. > > > Rob Studdert > HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > Tel +61-2-9554-4110 > UTC(GMT) +10 Hours > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ > Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
