I recently picked up the 1.4, for the Sigma 300 f 4 i have.
I used it on a film body this past (PZ-1)weekend and the sharpness in the
finder was very
good. I have
not developed the roll yet.Next week in class, if CUPE does not strike.
I will, hopefully, be trying it out this weeknd. I want to shoot some pictures
of the 155
year old farm
house we used to live in, before the developers tear it down so they can build
a bypass
road in the
spring.
Funny thing. Our town has a heratige committe, but will not save a house.
Several landmark
buildings
have come down recently.
Markham, just south of us, make it a priority. You can buy them for $1.00 but
you have to
have them
moved. Markham even bought 10 acres and subdivided, so these fine old homes
could be
bought ,and
if need be,buy a lot in the heritige subdivision.,then moved to them. Its quite
the
street. Newest home
was probably built in the late 1800's.:-)
Dave
> Collin R Brendemuehl wrote:
> > The APO version was rather popular with film
> > and cost usually 2x the standard 1.4x.
> > Now the APO is going for a little less on e*.
> >
> > Anyone using it with Digital? How do you like the results?
>
> I used it a lot with the D and 300/4 Sigma AF APO. It was a great
> combination. I also used the 2x EX alot and sometimes stacked them as
> well. Highly recommended. Some shots on my website are with t he 300/4
> Sigma, D and 1.4x or 2x TCs
>
>
> --
>
> Christian
> http://photography.skofteland.net
>
