What do you consider evidence? That's a key question.
I can't see or feel gravity but I can understand the concept and the effect
it has on things at large. I can see the reults of gravity. I may deny that
gravity exists, because I don't totally understand it or I may want to call
gravity something else, but that doesn't change reality.
Tom C.
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Religon, Christ vs. the Other Guy
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 07:20:50 -0600
----- Original Message ----- From: "E.R.N. Reed" Subject: Re: Religon,
Christ vs. the Other Guy
No.
Those who believe in a God can *answer* the question, not sidestep it.
Throughout human history, more rational people have believed in God, or
gods, than haven't. In all cultures.
I am not suggesting that the minority of humans in modern times who
conclude (for whatever) that there is no god are all irrational. I object
to your implying that those of us who conclude (for whatever reason) that
God (or gods) exist are not rational. That suggestion is both arrogant and
ridiculous.
Some just need evidence of something before we believe in it's existence.
William Robb
