Yes, you are right, of cource - typo, I suppose :-/ I hope the others are right. *ist D, DS and DS2 offers 0.95, the *ist DL 0.85 magnification ikon DX2 offers 1.0, D1X 0.8
Jens Bladt http://www.jensbladt.dk -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Adam Maas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 18. februar 2006 23:37 Til: [email protected] Emne: Re: Misteries of Ken Rockwell Jens, You might want to check again, DPreview is where I checked my numbers before posting. The D, DS and DS2 all are 95% and 0.95x, slightly larger than a 20d -Adam Jens Bladt wrote: >Adam, I got these figures off dpreview, so I suppose they are correctly >listed. > >Sometimes the magnicication is noted as "magnification", sometimes as a >"function" of the used lens, like this: >• Viewfinder magnification approx 0.94x with 50 mm f/1.4 lens (Nikon D200). >Someone might want to explain the difference og these definitions - if there >is one. >Regards >Jens Bladt >http://www.jensbladt.dk > >-----Oprindelig meddelelse----- >Fra: Adam Maas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sendt: 18. februar 2006 19:09 >Til: [email protected] >Emne: Re: SV: Misteries of Ken Rockwell > > >Jens, > >The D, DS and DS2 are all 0.95x, the DL and DL2 are 0.85x IIRC > >-Adam > > >Jens Bladt wrote: > > > >>I believe he may be talking about the maginification (eye to >>subject/viewafinder to subject), when the camera is mounted with a 50 lens. >>It's true this one is apr. 0.75 for the *sit D and DS. >>But that's not different from that of many other cameras - including the >>D70. >>It seems high end cameras usually have a magnification (eye to subject) at >>apr. 0.8 1.0 using a 50mm lens: >>20D: 0.90 >>EOS 1Ds: 0.70 >>300D: 0.88 >>D50: 0.75 >>D70: 0.75 >>D100: 0.80 >>D200: 0.94 >>D2Hs: 0.86 >> >>Regards >>Jens >> >> >> >> >>Regards >>Jens Bladt >>http://www.jensbladt.dk >> >>-----Oprindelig meddelelse----- >>Fra: Bob Shell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Sendt: 18. februar 2006 18:31 >>Til: [email protected] >>Emne: Re: Misteries of Ken Rockwell >> >> >> >>On Feb 18, 2006, at 10:47 AM, Jens Bladt wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>>I don't understand. >>>At dpreview it says that the D and DS have veiwfinders with 95% >>>coverage and >>>0,95 magnification. >>>My *ist D user manual says so too. >>>What am I missing, please? Is Ken Rockwell talking about something >>>different? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>Who knows? There has never been any sign that he has any idea of >>what he is talking about, so how could anyone else know? >> >>Bob >> >>-- >>No virus found in this incoming message. >>Checked by AVG Free Edition. >>Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.11/264 - Release Date: 02/17/2006 >> >>-- >>No virus found in this outgoing message. >>Checked by AVG Free Edition. >>Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.11/264 - Release Date: 02/17/2006 >> >> >> >> > > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.11/264 - Release Date: 02/17/2006 > >-- >No virus found in this outgoing message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.11/264 - Release Date: 02/17/2006 > > -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.11/264 - Release Date: 02/17/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.11/264 - Release Date: 02/17/2006
