Me too. We are assuming the big buffer and fast write speeds. -- Best regards, Bruce
Thursday, February 23, 2006, 5:46:59 PM, you wrote: PS> I couldn't care less what the new D looks like. If it has a fast write PS> speed, a large buffer and ten megapixels, I will fall in love. I am in PS> know way disappointed. I'm pumped. PS> Paul PS> On Feb 23, 2006, at 8:31 PM, Pål Jensen wrote: >> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Stenquist" >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>> It will most likely be similar to the Nikon D200, which B&H has >>> priced at l699. If it can equal that camera in specs, it will be a >>> winner in my book. I'm sure it will accommodate early lenses in a >>> manner at least as efficient as the D. >> >> >> I' am somewhat dissapointed. I think it is just an *isD with a better >> sensor. I also think that the camera looks rather bland particularly >> if it cost semi-pro money. The contrast to the 645D couldn't be >> larger. Although the 645D is no classical beauty, it is camera with >> presence, original design and doesn't look like anything else. In >> addition the design offers uniqe features. Most importantly the >> slanted top panel makes it possible to adjust and see setting when the >> camera is on a tripod at eye level. Anyone who has tried to change >> setting on, say, the Z-1p (who is the worst offender of all cameras as >> the LCD panel is at the top of the prism), under such circumstances >> knows it involves taking the camera off the tripod for setting >> functions. Also the two tripod sockets are brilliant. Why don't Pentax >> make their semi-pro K-mount DSLR similar? They are no longer bound to >> the old shapes dictated by film- >> >> >> Pål >>
