As Bob has pointed out here, 1/4000th can be achieved through
switching. It's certainly not hard to believe that the camera will be
capable of that. And it's not hard to believe that the photo would be
as authentic as possible. There is nothing ludicrous about surmising
that this number is indicative of real capability.
Paul
On Feb 24, 2006, at 10:25 PM, Perry Pellechia wrote:
On 2/24/06, Ryan K. Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
A disclaimer is not enough if you show something that appears to be
the product. Not in the US, in any case.
There's no units on the 4000, if anything it reads like 4000 ISO which
is as ludicrous as the 1/4000th conclusion at this point
Look at the photo again. The "4000" is next to a label "TV" which
loosely means time value, i.e., shutter. It is a pretty safe bet that
there is not a 4000s setting for the shutter.
<---------------------------------------------------->
Perry Pellechia
Primary email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alternate email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page: http://homer.chem.sc.edu/perry
<---------------------------------------------------->
