Aaron Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Some links to the original controversy: >> http://www.newmediamusings.com/blog/2003/08/charlotte_obser.html >> http://poynteronline.org/content/content_view.asp?id=47867 >> http://www.zonezero.com/editorial/octubre03/october.html >> http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=1415685 > >Those articles make reference to "his raw files" not "his files in the >RAW format" -- I think that they're just talking about his unaltered >original versions of the file. He stated specifically (in person, at the Grandfather Mountain Camera Clinic) that the Charlotte Observer has always required its photographers to shoot in RAW mode. Sorry I didn't make it clear that I got this from him directly, rather than from the articles referenced. >Can you not make adjustments to a RAW file and save it? No. Not yet... Actually, I think the latest version of DXO Optics Pro *will* allow you to re-save in RAW format after making corrections: Lens distortion, noise and lighting - this last correction ability might have saved Patrick Schneider some trouble! -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com
