Is a 1.35x crop factor really that much better than a 1.5x?
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 03:27:09PM -0800, Bruce Dayton wrote:
> One has to wonder if the DA lenses would have any coverage problems
> with it. Certainly a sensor like this would raise some eyebrows.
>
> --
> Bruce
>
>
> Monday, February 27, 2006, 4:12:25 PM, you wrote:
>
> RS> Gleaned from a tangential post at DPReview:
>
> RS> http://www.kodak.com/global/en/digital/ccd/products/fullframe/KAF-
> RS> 10010/specifications.jhtml?id=0.1.4.8.4.7.4&lc=en
>
> RS> http://tinyurl.com/ks8w8
>
> RS> Now that I would stick around for. What's the likelihood that Pentax
> would be
> RS> sourcing a 1.3x sensor from Kodak considering that the 645D sensor is
> likely
> RS> from the same crowd? Purely speculation on my part but hey that's what
> this
> RS> list's about?
>
> RS> Cheers,
>
>
> RS> Rob Studdert
> RS> HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
> RS> Tel +61-2-9554-4110
> RS> UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
> RS> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> RS> http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
> RS> Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
>
