> > From: Sylwester Pietrzyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2006/02/28 Tue PM 03:49:23 GMT > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Some more new camera speculation > > mike wilson wrote on 28.02.06 16:45: > > > I'm more interested in what is meant by "progressive replacement". PZ > > contacts could be used for USM? > Yes, they could, as in their patent (KAF3?), which I've sent in PDF file to > a few people. > That would be progressive replacement, as most people seem to agree that PZ was not a good implementation of technology. Replacement of mechanical aperture linkage with (effectively) nothing is not progressive....
m ----------------------------------------- Email sent from www.ntlworld.com Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information
