it would give you an image as big as a 35mm lens can provide. i suspect, in quite a few cases, it would be bigger than 35x24, and *never* smaller anyway.
so it'd be all gain and no loss, wouldn't it? best, mishka On 3/1/06, Rob Studdert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1 Mar 2006 at 7:35, Mishka wrote: > > > not neccessarily: a simple extention tube would do. > > It still wouldn't work unless of course the 645 sensor was sub-35mm sized or > if > they made it mirror-less :-)
