[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I owned one Sigma lens, the 17-35. It was one of their high-end models >with all those extra letters in its name. It was a turd. I sold it and >replaced it with the DA 16-45. No comparison. I went from shit to sugar.
I have the Sigma EX300/2.8 APO. Great build quality and optics. I'm sure the Pentax equivalent is better but it's also $1500 more expensive (the Sigma cost me about $2200). Anyone who comes to GFM is welcome to try out the Sigma.
