On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 10:46:34AM -0800, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > > On Mar 17, 2006, at 10:12 AM, John Francis wrote: > > >On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 11:37:55AM -0600, Charles Robinson wrote: > >>On Mar 17, 2006, at 1:15, John Francis wrote: > >>> > >>>Oh, I didn't *pay* for my Treo. I'm pretty sure I wouldn't > >>>have one if the cost was coming out of my pocket. After all, > >>>I don't have a Dell Axxim 51 (or whatever model it is) with > >>>that nice 640x480 display (Treos are square, 240x240). > >>> > >> > >>320x320 on the Treo 650, please. > > > >How interesting. I wonder whether that was a Microsoft decision > >to make the 700w have the same resolution as most of the other new > >square-screen phones. > > How would the design of the later 700w be affecting the design of the > 650 developed a year before?
It wouldn't, silly. But Microsoft could have decided that they wanted the 700w to be 240x240 to (as I said) match other smartphones.
