I don't know much, but will say that a new 19 inch flat LCD monitor at work has impressed me. The richness of the blacks has gone a long way to improve the 3-D rendering of images on the screen. Is it the 700:1 contrast ratio? Regards, Bob S.
On 3/22/06, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ken didn't mean "flat" as in lacking contrast. He meant that he finds > that analog prints have more of a three dimensional look. I don't see > that, but he may well have a more discriminating eye. > On Mar 22, 2006, at 2:22 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote: > > > I've got to agree. When I have flat images, it's because I didn't > > post processing them properly. You should work on those skills, > > rather than relying on the lab to do that for you by using film. > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Bruce > > > > > > Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 9:59:59 PM, you wrote: > > > > > > GD> On Mar 21, 2006, at 9:18 PM, K.Takeshita wrote: > > > >>> ... But when printed, I cannot help noticing that the digital > >>> images are always > >>> flat (not always but many times). ... > > > > GD> I'm sorry, Ken, but this is ridiculous. > > GD> If you are printing images that look flat, they are not rendered > > GD> correctly. > > > > GD> Period. > > > > GD> Godfrey > > > > > > > >
