Here is an interesting take on a panorama picture: A panorama that's 54' by 3" (that's 54 feet, 3 inches)
http://www.santoroland.com/siggraph2004/artgallery.html It was shown at SIGGRAPH 2004. Anthony, the guy who made it, is a friend of a friend. j On 3/22/06, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The plethora of panoramas posted here in recent weeks is interesting from a > technical standpoint, but for the most part they are boring and > uninteresting photos - at best a documentary of some space that looks good > spread out over a wide number of pixels. I've seen nothing original, > nothing that's not been seen before, no matter how well executed or pretty > the scenes may be. Skylines and beaches seem to be a dominant theme ... > often patched together from segments that by themselves would be of little > interest on many levels. > > I liked what Bob Sullivan tried to do with his panorama of a few runners in > the park on an early morning? In some ways it wasn't as finely executed as > some of the technological tours de force others have posted, but what made > it outstanding is that Bob was working with a relatively closed and small > space, trying to capture something more intimate. > > So, here's a panorama challenge: make something different, maybe a macro > panorama, or one of some everyday object like a sofa or a car, or of > something in your house. > > Shel > > > -- Juan Buhler Water Molotov: http://photoblog.jbuhler.com Slippery Slope: http://color.jbuhler.com
