Thanks, Rick. And you're right, there is too much red. So I scanned it again, and played with the scanner driver a bit. In this one the red in the coat looks a lot more like the slide, and the lawn (cough) has a little more green. I'm still not satisfied with it, but I'll have to tinker with it later when I'm a little more alert.
Second attempt: http://twosixteen.com/gallery/index.php?id=285 On 3/23/06, Rick Womer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There ain't nothin' like them Kodachrome reds...though > the color in the ground makes me think that you're > RSGs (Red Scanning Gremlins) are at work again. > > Rick > > --- Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Howdy, gang! A few weeks ago I bought a few rolls > > of Kodachrome 200, > > dragged my daughter outside and shot a whole roll > > (she's a willing > > model most days). Most of the compositions leave a > > lot to be desired, > > but this was really an experiment with a film I've > > never used before. > > I received that first roll back today and the > > following photo was > > among my favorites. Boos and applause equally > > welcome. > > > > http://twosixteen.com/gallery/index.php?id=284 > > Kodachrome 200, bright mid-day sun > > > > -- > > Scott Loveless > > http://www.twosixteen.com > > > > -- > > "You have to hold the button down" -Arnold Newman > > > > > > > http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > -- Scott Loveless http://www.twosixteen.com -- "You have to hold the button down" -Arnold Newman
