Thanks, Bob. Your support is apprecieated ;-) Regards Jens Bladt http://www.jensbladt.dk
-----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Bob Shell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 24. marts 2006 23:19 Til: [email protected] Emne: Re: crop factor vs. telephoto factor On Mar 24, 2006, at 4:37 PM, Jens Bladt wrote: > Not at all. > CoC is noramally defined as the acceptable "unsharpness", still > accepted as > "sharp" in a final images. CoC has nothing to do with HOW or by > what means > the image was made. However, this acceptable level of unsharpness > is often > defined differently for different formats. > But this was not the subject. > The subject was which lenses (focal lengths) will record which images. > > Bringing CoC in to the discussion is not helping anybody to > undserstand the > basic fact, that the same lens produces basically the same images, > regardless of the camera or sensor used. How you an I may assess > the final > results is not relevant to the subject. CoC is a relativ term > designed to > establish a commonly accepted measure for acceptable unsharpness. > It's an > agreement in the photographic industry. Not a scientific property > of optics. Correct, Jens. Bob -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.0/290 - Release Date: 03/23/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.1/292 - Release Date: 03/24/2006
