David, I object to being told that I am not creative, but instead a technician. Why do you feel I should not be insulted by that? Here are the relevant passages, word for word: --- Photography is a craft. Digital imaging is a science. Working at a craft is infinitely more satisfying, and I think it's a lot more fun. Working at science is just a chore.
I suspect that each is supported by a different type of person. There are many techies who love digital, and will thrive on Photoshop and all the things they can do with it. --- -Aaron -----Original Message----- From: "David Savage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subj: Re: Bailing out. Date: Sun Mar 26, 2006 11:00 am Size: 1K To: [email protected] On 3/26/06, Aaron Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mar 26, 2006, at 10:32 AM, Colin J wrote: > > > I was merely expressing my opinion. It differs > > from yours. I respect yours but I don't agree > > with it. If that bothers you, then I'm sorry for > > you, because people should be able to hold > > differing opinions about the same thing without > > becoming offended. > > You didn't say "my opinion is that digital is bad and chemical is > good", you said that one IS bad and one IS good. > > If you're just speaking of your own perception, don't phrase it as an > absolute and you won't have to argue it. > > -Aaron WTF? Colin didn't say anything of the sort. Jesus your argumentative. Am I reading the same posts as you? Quit paraphrasing other peoples comments with your spin on them. I don't think one person has said film and chemicals are better than the digital process, or visa versa, just that they have a personal preference. Do we all now need to get lawyers to proof read our posts and correct them to ensure that our personal opinions are clearly and unambiguously outlined before we comment on anything? Frank? How much to have you on retainer? Dave -- "All I ask is the chance to prove that money can't make me happy." - Spike Milligan
