I've always thought of my RAW processing as the funflow. Especially,
when I have a few fingers of scotch whiskey to help keep the fun
flowing.
Paul
On Mar 27, 2006, at 8:13 PM, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
Doesn't "workflow" come from the corporate world?
I've only ever called it workflow here on the list while responding to
someone else who had called it workflow -- my digital darkroom
actually was in my old colour darkroom, still said COLOUR DARKROOM on
the door (though I added an Apple logo sticker), and I usually closed
the door and turned off the lights when I went in.
I also had a brilliant old Kodak ad from the 1920s that I glued to the
side of one of my monitors (I was running three computers -- one
scanning, one doing the heavy lifting of correcting etc, and one
running the printers) -- it had a woman sitting at a table with a
hand-crank daylight film processor, under the legend "The Kodak girl
at home". Emblazoned across the bottom of the ad, in
Believe-It-Or-Not lettering was "THE DARKROOM ABOLISHED BY THE KODAK
DEVELOPING MACHINE!"
-Aaron
-----Original Message-----
From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subj: Re: Bailing out.
Date: Mon Mar 27, 2006 3:48 pm
Size: 2K
To: [email protected]
I'm like Shel. The word just bugs me is all.
Whatever the hell it is I do only became called workflow since the
advent of computers and scanning and digital storage/manipulation.
What I do is "get film developed and have prints made".
You (and everyone else) can call it whatever you want. <g>
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
