These files looked like many were shot in incandescent light with white balance set to daylight - not a little shot of auto levels - more serious color correction and brightness adjustment - they weren't just a little off, they were way off. If the customer hadn't already seen some good prints, they would have gone big time ballistic.
-- Bruce Monday, March 27, 2006, 7:44:45 PM, you wrote: AR> On Mar 27, 2006, at 10:39 PM, William Robb wrote: >> I don't know about that. I find most complaints are generated because >> it looked good on the customers' screen, and I can't get a good print. >> My own experience tells me that if I can't get a good print at home, >> taking it to work isn't going to help. AR> It's not that you can't get a good print, it's that you can't get a AR> good print without DOING something to it (like hitting auto levels). AR> I'm not saying he wasn't foolish to give them uncorrected files without AR> warning them -- he was. I'm just saying that in 90% of cases, wedding AR> photographers are never going to look at those files beyond ditching AR> the bad ones before they send them to the lab for proofing. AR> -Aaron
