On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 08:27:21PM -0500, Bob Shell wrote: > > On Mar 29, 2006, at 7:08 PM, John Francis wrote: > > >I'd have thought this article (linked off the page below) was a lot > >more > >relevant to us photographers (or is that image capture > >technicians? :-) > > > > http://www.eetimes.com/news/latest/showArticle.jhtml? > >articleID=184401030 > > > That's a pretty weird story. > > Bob
Possibly. I'd like to know a little more. It may be that Kodak are, indeed, screwing over their customers. Or it may simply be a disgruntled and obsessive (ex-)employee who disagreed with something as simple as the level of JPEG compression Kodak chose to apply - a pixel peeper who objected to any lossy steps, even if these would never show up in a print.
