Maybe so. But since I started using the Spyder2, my prints now look like what's on screen.
Before then, making a print was a trial & error process. Dave S On 4/19/06, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What kills me, reading between the lines, is that buying one of these things > does not neccesarially mean one's monitor will be calibrated properly. > > > Tom C. > > > > > > > >From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: [email protected] > >To: [email protected] > >Subject: Re: OT: Monitor color adjust > >Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 19:33:57 +1000 > > > >On 18 Apr 2006 at 18:03, David Mann wrote: > > > > > About the only page I could find that had a useful comparison was this: > > > http://www.drycreekphoto.com/Learn/monitor_calibration_tools.htm > > > > > > The Monaco and G-M systems seem to be pretty close. The comments > > > about the highlights discouraged me from looking at the Spyder2. > > > >It seems like an unnecessary beat-up to me. > > > > > >Rob Studdert > >HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > >Tel +61-2-9554-4110 > >UTC(GMT) +10 Hours > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >http:/home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio/publications/ > >Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 > > > > >
