I'd have been the first had I seen the pic before Paul <LOL> I played around a bit with the rotation and settled on a 0.04 degree rotation, which looks pretty good to these old eyes. At 0.05 degrees I'm starting to see, or feel, the lamp tilting the other way.
Shel > [Original Message] > From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Date: 4/21/2006 4:28:49 PM > Subject: Re: PAW 2006 - 04 - GDG > > LOL ... I was wondering who would be the first to suggest rotation. ;-) > > It's hard to judge. I've used the edge of the wharf as a reference > line and Photoshop suggests -.09 degree rotation. If I use the > horizon, it suggests -.2 degrees. Problem is that when I do the > rotation, it looks like it's leaning the other way as the lamp and > bench fool the eye. > > G > > On Apr 21, 2006, at 4:04 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: > > > Interesting in its minimalism. But this is such a geometric > > composition that I think it requires complete accuracy. It appears > > to need a counterclockwise rotation of about half a degree. > http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW6/04.htm
