It is a bit soft, but I agree on the positioning - quite good indeed! -- Bruce
Tuesday, April 25, 2006, 7:39:43 AM, you wrote: Eac> I feel I shouldn't just dump PESOs out there without making a few comments on Eac> others'. But a bit busy with Mom. However, I'll try to make some comments Eac> soon. Eac> Again, following Bruce's suggestions for camera settings for the Monterey Bay Eac> Aquarium, I shot a lot of jelly fish. I felt there should have been some slow Eac> classical music on the background, maybe a waltz, to go a long with their Eac> graceful, slow movement. Eac> None are super sharp, but some are a tad sharper than others. I may throw up Eac> a jellyfish gallery next week. The have a tad more impact when taken together, Eac> and they would also probably display well on that way too. Say, a group of Eac> four or so. Eac> 1600, 50mm, 2.8, about 1/15 of a second, and accidentally shot JPG rather Eac> than RAW (because the no flash setting on my camera did that without my awareness Eac> of it) Eac> This is not the sharpest, not the worse, not the best, but I liked the Eac> juxtaposition of the two. Eac> Remember shot through, glass, water, and with a large f stop. Eac> http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/jellies.htm Eac> Comments, welcome. Eac> Marnie aka Doe
