Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: >A natural considering that the survey was conceived and written by >the folks manning the desk at OpenRaw.org. I found the survey >questions somewhat biased to a conclusion.
I agree. I did participate in the survey, but I was quite disappointed in the leading nature of most of the questions, particularly because I believe there are some important issues here. And doubly so because the survey would have been a lot more credible (and possibly influential) if it had been done in a more balanced fashion and I don't think doing would have affected the outcome significantly. In other words, they not only shot themselves in the foot, they did so unnecessarily :(
