*You're* reaction is more of "the sky is falling". My post neither had that tone nor was meant to imply that tone. Nor am I worried about not being able to use a digital camera. Nevertheless, I found the article interesting and my response was tongue-in-cheek, along the lines of an anti-anti-missle-missile.
Tom C. >From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: Digital Camera Blocking Technology >Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:47:47 -0700 > >This nonsense has been emailed around several times already. >The Sky Is Faling! Film Is Essential! > >Now what's that thing that PJ has as his signature? > >"If you're troubled or in doubt > run in circles, scream and shout!" > >G > >On Jun 20, 2006, at 1:42 PM, Tom C wrote: > > > A digital camera detector blocker is in order... or maybe just film. > > http://upi.com/NewsTrack/view.php?StoryID=20060619-062742-6349r > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >[email protected] >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
