>> > It's possible to do even better than that - if the motion detectors >> > include accelerometers then the stabilization logic could smooth out >> > wobbles while maintaining the same average pan rate.
I wish this question had been brought up when the rep was still at my shop. He had his K100D with him (which I got to play with) and I could have snooped around the menu had I thought of it. It was a preproduction model, however, so I'm not sure how accurate my findings would have been. By the way, he showed me some slow-speed shots he took at a wedding recently. One was as slow as 1/3 sec, hand held, and it showed very little blur for such a slow speed. The shots at 1/10 and 1/15 were better, of course, but all in all, the Shake Reduction worked very well for that particular situation (he was using the 18-55mm, btw). I wish I could have done some closer inspections of the photos, but since I was at work, I had to, y'know, work. John Celio -- http://www.neovenator.com AIM: Neopifex "Hey, I'm an artist. I can do whatever I want and pretend I'm making a statement." > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
