Paul Stenquist wrote:
> 
> Sorry Ann, didn't mean to offend. But even a change to the 100K number
> you cite would be helpful. 75K is an artifact of the days of 300 baud
> modems. It's not even in keeping with the capability of current dial-up
> modems.
> Paul

Thanks, Paul apology most certainly accepted -
sure 100k is fine even with my old 'puter, I was thinking
more of the times
I tried to download 500k - I felt bad I couldn't see some
stuff to comment on it.
OTOH - hey, my dumb old computer can be useful for excuses
for not commenting! ha!
always room for good exucses :) :)

Best,
Ann


> On Jun 20, 2006, at 11:31 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
> 
> > Paul Stenquist wrote:
> >>
> >> I was going to comment on the size restriction as well, but decided
> >> not
> >> to stir the pot. But since you bring it up: yes it is a problem. It's
> >> very difficult to prepare an acceptable image at less than 75K. I find
> >> that I have to strip the metadata, so I do a save for web. But at 600
> >> pixels or less on the long side, it's hard to provide an image that
> >> viewers can actually see. These limits are an historic artifact from
> >> the early days of the list and PUG. It's really time to change them.
> >> But every time that has been suggested, it seems there was an outcry
> >> of
> >> unfair to dialup users. Perhaps dial-up is virtually dead, and we can
> >> mover forward
> >> On Jun 20, 2006, at 9:13 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> >>
> > What, Paul, you too?
> >
> > Dial-up is NOT dead by a long shot.
> > I can't even get anything else in my neighborhood right
> > now even if i could afford it.... and I can't.
> >
> > As it is, I can't see half the stuff you guys post to the
> > list to look at because it
> > takes so long to load and it slows down the system trying.
> >
> > I wish I could have faster access - it takes me too long to
> > list things on ebay, too
> > long to do everything, but what part of some of us don't
> > have the bucks don't you
> > guys understand??
> >
> > IT really is very hurtful
> >
> > ann
> >
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > [email protected]
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >
> 
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to