I second that. My comments had absolutely nothing to do with Adelheid's selfless work. I just wished to spark some discussion about how to make the PUG more popular.
And my comment about it slowly dying was as much to do with the lack of comment on the PUG submissions here in the forum as it was about the quality and quantity of those submissions. A PUG which attracts more and better pictures, and more discussion, will make Adelheid's efforts more worthwhile. John On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 00:07:52 +0100, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What's the deal Cotty? This is not a debate or referendum on Adelheid's > management of the PUG. She's done an excellent job. > > This is a debate as to the nature of the PUG itself, and whether it > should > be a high quality gallery showcasing the best participants have to offer > or > whether it should simply be a photo sharing site. If it's nothing more > than > the latter, it's actually a shame someone must sacrifice their time to > maintain it. If it's the former, then it's a labor of love and that's > always > worth it. > > > > Tom C. > > > > > > >> From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >> To: "pentax list" <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: PUG/PESO ...at Flickr? >> Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 23:18:16 +0100 >> >> Adelheid, if you're reading this thread, please don't despair. There's >> only one PUG, and I for one would appreciate it even if there was only >> one contribution a month. It would still be alive with that single >> picture. Go PUG! >> -- >> >> >> Cheers, >> Cotty >> >> >> ___/\__ >> || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche >> ||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com >> _____________________________ >> >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
