Thanks. "won't be all that noticeable" is a bit vague, but it means it will be noticeable.
But yes, I guess you're right about larger print sizes. -- Cheers, Bob > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Adam Maas > Sent: 25 June 2006 23:38 > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: Print sizes and megapixels > > If it's from a 3MP DSLR, it won't be all that noticable. > > Note you don't need 300dpi for larger print sizes, generally > 16x20 and > up. Because the viewing distance gets larger. > > -Adam > > > > Bob W wrote: > > >Hmm. OK. Let's say we use a 6mp camera and make print 18x24cm (7x10") > >without uprezzing. With all other things being equal, suppose we also > >make an 18x24cm print from a 3mp camera, with uprezzing. Can you tell > >the difference at a normal viewing distance? If so, how > obvious is it? > > > >-- > >Cheers, > > Bob > > > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > >>Behalf Of mike wilson > >> > >> > >>Try Gurgling for "rezzing up" - the process of increasing a > >>digital file by inserting information that was never there in > >>the first place but might be a reasonable facsimilie of the > >>original scene.... > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
