On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 22:51:00 +0100, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> John Forbes wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 22:04:58 +0100, mike wilson  
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>> From: "John Forbes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> Date: 2006/06/26 Mon PM 06:29:20 GMT
>>>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
>>>> Subject: Re: Windoze versions and DS
>>>>
>>>> Mike,
>>>>
>>>> I suspect that once you get the software sorted out, much of your bias
>>>> against digital cameras will disappear. :-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Once Pentax produces a digital LX, much of my bias will disappear, for
>>> sure.  As will much of my income and probably my marriage.  8-))))
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I can't think of much that the LX does that the D can't do, but there  
>> is a lot that the D can do which the LX can't.
>>
>> It's not so robust, though.



> The LX does metered exposures past 30 seconds,

Useful once in a blue moon

> can adjust exposure during the exposure in Av mode.

Only useful when doing very long exposures - once in a blue moon

> Works without batteries.

So why does it have batteries?

> Shoots at ISO's below 200.

That's useful - wish the D did.

> Take high magnification finders for macro work.

Easy to attach a suitable magnifier to the D.

> 5fps drive for up to 36 exposures.

Ever used it?

> Full aperture metering with all K mount lenses,

Useful only if you insist on using old lenses.

> successfully mounts Ricoh P lenses.

Don't have any.

> Oh, and you can fit it in a pocket with a pancake lens (50/2M, 40/2.8M)

As with the D


> On the other hand, the D AF's, offers matrix and spot metering, Program  
> and Shutter priority modes, has a higher flash sync, higher max shutter  
> speed and support wireless TTL flash.

And many more things too numerous to list, many of which are actually  
useful on a daily basis.

> I'd call it even.

I'll stick with the D.

John

> -Adam
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to