On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 18:42:22 +0200, AvK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i didn't read your post as that, what i am frustrated about, is the > fact, that because of this quality discussion, the ones who are not as > skilled as some of you undoubtedly are, might be discouraged to > contribute a pic that you might consider a snapshot. > Since the pros on that list don't bother to contribute i am happy about > any contribution that i get. May it be of poor quality in some eyes, but > it is an effort, that others didn't bother to make.
Oh joy, just as I decided to retreat comfortably into PESO's you post this... I see if I can manage to snap some architecture around here. As a concession to Tom, I'll try to make it a good, or at least decent snap :o) Anyway, thanks for maintaining the PUG. I hope it'll stay around for a while... -- Regards, Lucas > Just my 2 cents and now i go back to make the PUG. > I am quiet now. I have work to do. ;-) > Best > Adelheid > >> Hi Adelheid, >> >> Respectfully, none of the comments on that topic was ever intended to >> make >> you a subject of the discussion and I was extremely careful to avoid >> that. >> >> I'm sorry you are feeling frustrated. >> >> I think the conversation was healthy overall - not futile bickering. It >> may >> lead to more participation and to higher quality submissions. >> >> I'm sure all who have participated in the past or will in the future, >> appreciate your efforts. >> >> Tom C. >> >> >From: "AvK" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >> >To: "Pentax Discuss" <[email protected]> >> >Subject: PUG again >> >Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 17:54:15 +0200 >> > >> >Hi folks, >> > >> >you know that i am very quiet on this list, because i simply don't have >> the >> >time to post. >> > >> >I hack out every month the time from my busy schedule to make the PUG. >> >Ok i have automated it quite a bit and i am willing to do it for some >> time >> >to come. If the ones who have the time to bicker about the PUG would >> spend >> >this time to contribute it would be better spent time in my humble >> opinion. >> > >> >I am bit frustrated, so don't take this comment as a reason for a new >> round >> >of bickering. >> > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
