I've seen some portfolios from working pros with similar highly saturated work. Some of them are making a lot of money. It's different, it's not realistic, but it's not necessarily bad. It's just a different way of looking at the world, and -- by the way -- when done well, it can sell. Paul On Jun 28, 2006, at 7:21 PM, Don Sanderson wrote:
> Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee....UCK!!!! > > D > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of >> Bob W >> Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 5:02 PM >> To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' >> Subject: RE: Re: Cartoon effect >> >> >>>> >>>> Looks over-saturated to me, otherwise, v nice. >>>> >>> >>> There you have it. I metered off the greenery, it was a >>> nicely overcast day. All settings in camera and software >>> were standard. It just looks wrong. Pretty but wrong. >>> >>> Not that slide film would have done much better - just wrong >>> in a different way..... >>> >> >> I don't know if this is exactly what you mean, but when I opened this >> webpage and saw the pictures I actually flinched, and I don't think >> that's happened to me before looking at photos: >> http://www.jturnerphotography.com/ >> >> These seem to me to be at least as devoid of taste as the Stepford >> women. Are these perhaps Stepford landscapes? >> >> Bob >> >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
