Point 3 isn't valid either. If lab processing is the way you want to 
go, you can drop off a memory card at any halfway decent lab and pick 
up your prints in a couple of hours. The minilab that used to process 
my color neg film claims they can produce even nicer prints from best 
quality jpegs. I haven't had any reason to try them, but I might. But 
even when I was shooting color film, I regarded those prints as nothing 
more than proofs. I would then scan the best frames and make my own 
prints. I never found a lab that did a better job at a reasonable 
price.
Paul
On Jul 1, 2006, at 1:30 PM, Jack Davis wrote:

> Jens,
> Actually, your point #3 is the only one that has true application if
> one considers digital in general.
> All are valid if specific brands are considered.
>
> Jack
>
> --- Jens Bladt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> 1st
>> Speed, is one thing. 2,5 fps and 36 shots in a row.
>> No Pentax DSLR can do that.
>>
>> 2nd
>> Annother thing is that there's NO crop factor. Meaning more wide
>> angle for
>> the buck.
>>
>> 3rd
>> It's so easy to shoot a film, give it to the lab and then pick up
>> nice
>> photographs. No hazzle with editing in the computer, cropping,
>> resizing,
>> printing etc.
>> When the last shot is finished, your work is already done! Digital
>> photography is for people that are either rather uncritical or have a
>> lot of
>> time on their hands.
>>
>> That three very good reason to shoot film.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Jens Bladt
>> http://www.jensbladt.dk
>>
>>
>> -----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
>> Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af
>> Jack
>> Davis
>> Sendt: 1. juli 2006 18:18
>> Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> Emne: Re: Coming Soon - A new K-mount Film Camera
>>
>>
>> Adam,
>> I'd be interested in knowing what it is that you "want" that film
>> alone
>> satisfies.
>> I'm not doubting your word, just mulling the digital switch.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jack
>>
>> --- Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> People are still buying them.
>>>
>>> In fact some of us are quite happily shooting film, and intend to
>>> shoot
>>> film as long as it's available. Digital is nice, but it doesn't do
>>> everything I want.
>>>
>>> -Adam
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Don Williams wrote:
>>>
>>>> I don't quite understand why new 35mm bodies are being made at
>> all.
>>> Two
>>>> film makers (that I know of) have stopped making 35mm film and the
>>> sales
>>>> of digital cameras keeps climbing -- and the prices keep coming
>>> down.
>>>> Will good high res film continue to be available? If so I think I
>>> ought
>>>> to get the Wild/Leica Microscope camera out of the cupboard --
>> where
>>> I
>>>> put it when the *ist D arrived.
>>>>
>>>> Don
>>>>
>>>> Bob Shell wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Jun 30, 2006, at 8:30 PM, Scott Loveless wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> This little guy's been around for a year or two.  From the few
>>> reviews
>>>>>> I've read about it, it seems to be mechanically very similar (if
>>> not
>>>>>> identical) to the K-mount bodies offered by Phoenix, Vivitar,
>>>>>> Promaster, etc.  However, the last time I picked up a Promaster
>>>>>> K-body, IIRC it was made in China or Thailand.  The VSL43 is
>> made
>>> in
>>>>>> Japan, so I may be completely wrong about the similarities.  The
>>>>>> reviews do suggest that it has a very nice viewfinder.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> It's made by Cosina in Japan.  Same innards as some of the
>> Vivitar
>>>
>>>>> SLR cameras.
>>>>>
>>>>> The Promaster you saw is a rebadged Seagull from China.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bob
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________
>> Do You Yahoo!?
>> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> --
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.8/380 - Release Date:
>> 06/30/2006
>>
>> --
>> No virus found in this outgoing message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.8/380 - Release Date:
>> 06/30/2006
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to