Make that, "I don't understand YOUR answer." Paul On Jul 1, 2006, at 4:18 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> I don't understand our answer. You say that you want others to process > your images. But you can't imagine turning over a card full of images > to a lab. You can't have it both ways. > Paul > On Jul 1, 2006, at 4:09 PM, Jack Davis wrote: > >> Mini-lab prints from film are, for me, only proofs. Often I only ask >> for a CD. >> My weakness is the fact that I have a version of Photoshop and minimal >> resistance when it comes to allowing another to "process" my images. >> Can't imagine turning over a card full of images to a mini-lab. Maybe >> at an in-law birthday party and lawn sale, but nothing else. >> Point #3 IS valid for me. IOW, I know myself. >> >> Jack >> >> --- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Point 3 isn't valid either. If lab processing is the way you want to >>> go, you can drop off a memory card at any halfway decent lab and pick >>> >>> up your prints in a couple of hours. The minilab that used to process >>> >>> my color neg film claims they can produce even nicer prints from best >>> >>> quality jpegs. I haven't had any reason to try them, but I might. But >>> >>> even when I was shooting color film, I regarded those prints as >>> nothing >>> more than proofs. I would then scan the best frames and make my own >>> prints. I never found a lab that did a better job at a reasonable >>> price. >>> Paul >>> On Jul 1, 2006, at 1:30 PM, Jack Davis wrote: >>> >>>> Jens, >>>> Actually, your point #3 is the only one that has true application >>> if >>>> one considers digital in general. >>>> All are valid if specific brands are considered. >>>> >>>> Jack >>>> >>>> --- Jens Bladt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> 1st >>>>> Speed, is one thing. 2,5 fps and 36 shots in a row. >>>>> No Pentax DSLR can do that. >>>>> >>>>> 2nd >>>>> Annother thing is that there's NO crop factor. Meaning more wide >>>>> angle for >>>>> the buck. >>>>> >>>>> 3rd >>>>> It's so easy to shoot a film, give it to the lab and then pick up >>>>> nice >>>>> photographs. No hazzle with editing in the computer, cropping, >>>>> resizing, >>>>> printing etc. >>>>> When the last shot is finished, your work is already done! Digital >>>>> photography is for people that are either rather uncritical or >>> have a >>>>> lot of >>>>> time on their hands. >>>>> >>>>> That three very good reason to shoot film. >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> >>>>> Jens Bladt >>>>> http://www.jensbladt.dk >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- >>>>> Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne >>> af >>>>> Jack >>>>> Davis >>>>> Sendt: 1. juli 2006 18:18 >>>>> Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>> Emne: Re: Coming Soon - A new K-mount Film Camera >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Adam, >>>>> I'd be interested in knowing what it is that you "want" that film >>>>> alone >>>>> satisfies. >>>>> I'm not doubting your word, just mulling the digital switch. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Jack >>>>> >>>>> --- Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> People are still buying them. >>>>>> >>>>>> In fact some of us are quite happily shooting film, and intend to >>>>>> shoot >>>>>> film as long as it's available. Digital is nice, but it doesn't >>> do >>>>>> everything I want. >>>>>> >>>>>> -Adam >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Don Williams wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't quite understand why new 35mm bodies are being made at >>>>> all. >>>>>> Two >>>>>>> film makers (that I know of) have stopped making 35mm film and >>> the >>>>>> sales >>>>>>> of digital cameras keeps climbing -- and the prices keep coming >>>>>> down. >>>>>>> Will good high res film continue to be available? If so I think >>> I >>>>>> ought >>>>>>> to get the Wild/Leica Microscope camera out of the cupboard -- >>>>> where >>>>>> I >>>>>>> put it when the *ist D arrived. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Don >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bob Shell wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Jun 30, 2006, at 8:30 PM, Scott Loveless wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This little guy's been around for a year or two. From the few >>>>>> reviews >>>>>>>>> I've read about it, it seems to be mechanically very similar >>> (if >>>>>> not >>>>>>>>> identical) to the K-mount bodies offered by Phoenix, Vivitar, >>>>>>>>> Promaster, etc. However, the last time I picked up a >>> Promaster >>>>>>>>> K-body, IIRC it was made in China or Thailand. The VSL43 is >>>>> made >>>>>> in >>>>>>>>> Japan, so I may be completely wrong about the similarities. >>> The >>>>>>>>> reviews do suggest that it has a very nice viewfinder. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It's made by Cosina in Japan. Same innards as some of the >>>>> Vivitar >>>>>> >>>>>>>> SLR cameras. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The Promaster you saw is a rebadged Seagull from China. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Bob >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> __________________________________________________ >>>>> Do You Yahoo!? >>>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >>>>> http://mail.yahoo.com >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>>> -- >>>>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >>>>> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.8/380 - Release Date: >>>>> 06/30/2006 >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> No virus found in this outgoing message. >>>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >>>>> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.8/380 - Release Date: >>>>> 06/30/2006 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> __________________________________________________ >>>> Do You Yahoo!? >>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >>>> http://mail.yahoo.com >>>> >>>> -- >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> === message truncated === >> >> >> __________________________________________________ >> Do You Yahoo!? >> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >> http://mail.yahoo.com >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
