Yes, I would certainly agree on this.
Did a bit of scouting around on a new 503 at a surprisingly low price but was really
taken aback at the (unreasonably high) price of accessories.
So the 6x7 it is.
One last bit of information required: is it true that the 645n is easier to hand hold
than the 67II?
Been reading a lot about the mirror whiplash on the 67 and the weight problem and since
at times, I don't pack a tripod into my hiking kit, this may be a deciding factor.
Anyone use a 67 regularly without a tripod?
Thanks,
RK
dave o'brien wrote:
> Because (and a lot of friends have been snared by this) you can get a
> Hassy body and standard lens for small money, but as soon as you want
> anything else, just stick a knife in your wallet and bleed it dry in
> your camera shop. You're probably looking at 5 times Pentax price for
> a lens, especially a wide angle.
> Currently, I'm thinking about a 135/f4 macro for Pentax 6x7 for about
> USD200. How much is that going to be for a Hassy equiv? Someone tell
> us please.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
