> 
> From: Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/07/05 Wed PM 06:51:37 GMT
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: PESO - Portrait
> 
> I know you have worked on stuff like this before.  This is pretty
> good.  It gives a sense of who she might be.  It causes me to look at
> things that could be associated with her and her thoughts.
> 
> With it all, I find that I am wanting to have something more in this
> portrait.  Perhaps some sense of her being there - a shadow that I
> could identify as her or something.  Perhaps a hand or shoulder or
> something.  I think that would strengthen this even more.  I hope you
> understand what I am trying to say.
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> Bruce

IMHO, that's what makes this (and many other photographs) good to the point of 
being considered art.  A technically excellent picture that portrays exactly 
what was there is one thing.  A picture that makes you think "what about....?" 
or "why....?" is something entirely different.

> 
> 
> Wednesday, July 5, 2006, 10:13:02 AM, you wrote:
> 
> SB> Over the past few years, ever since seeing Elliott Erwitt's famous 
> portrait
> SB> of the cellist, Cassals, I've been making portraits of people by showing
> SB> something of their environment, trying to capture a bit of who they are,
> SB> their interests, personalities, without including the person in the shot.
> SB> You've seen some of these photos posted here before.  Here's a recent
> SB> portrait of my friend Linda.  
> 
> SB> http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/portrait.html
> 
> 
> SB> Shel
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> 


-----------------------------------------
Email sent from www.ntlworld.com
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software 
Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to